Yu Jianing, co-chairman of the Special Blockchain Committee of the China Communications Industry Association, said that the launch of the CDATP shows that the pace of growth for asset digitization is increasing, but he also acknowledged that digital assets in China face several problems such as technical limitations, collection valuation and copyright disputes. The China Digital Asset Trading Platform (CDATP) was jointly built by state-owned China Technology Exchange and China Cultural Relics Exchange Center in partnership with Huaban Digital Copyright Service Center, a private company. 1, China launched the first legally-compliant secondary trading platform for digital assets across the country. Other NFT platforms are in the process of moving their businesses to Hong Kong, which has taken a more open approach towards digital assets. The lack of clear regulation is hurting China’s NFT industry, as evidenced by the fact that Huanhe, the regulated NFT marketplace of Tencent Holdings, will be shutting down in June and has already begun the process of refunding its users. Most of the complaints involved failure to receive items after purchase, refund issues, price manipulation, and high transaction fees. The court found that NFTs “have the object characteristics of property rights such as value, scarcity, controllability, and tradability” and “belong to network virtual property” meaning that they “should be protected by the laws of our country.” Their definition of NFTs set an important and far-reaching precedent for digital property in China, and further distinguished NFTs from cryptocurrencies and other banned digital assets.īut on March 14, authorities in China released a report showing a 30,000% rise in complaints about NFT scams and price manipulation between 20.Īccording to the State Administration for Market Regulation report, there were 59,700 NFT-related complaints logged in 2022, up from 198 in 2021. 5 ruling by the Hangzhou Internet Court, which established that nonfungible tokens (NFT) constitute online virtual property and are recognized under Chinese law. This position on NFT ownership appears to contradict the landmark Dec.

'What consumers enjoy is only an exclusive right to prohibit others from tampering with the ownership of the NFT recorded on the blockchain.' 'From the perspective of property rights, consumers do not enjoy the ownership of the NFT digital assets they purchase in the sense of civil law, and consumers cannot prohibit others from accessing, copying or disseminating the digital assets mapped by NFT,' the report said. The prosecutors acknowledged that “as a new application of blockchain technology, NFT has certain development potential.' However, they also saw a tendency toward “securitization” of NFTs where ownership of one token or collection was shared among multiple individuals, which they claim violated proper NFT criteria such as non-reproducibility, indivisibility and uniqueness. As a result, the domestic NFT market in China is largely self-regulated by the industry. NFTs have existed in a legal gray area since China moved to make cryptocurrencies illegal in Sept. “Prosecutors are paying close attention.” 'While has high popularity, it is very likely to cause financial risks, management risks, network security risks, etc., and especially legal risks,” they wrote. The guidelines from the Supreme People's Procuratorate of the People's Republic of China recommend stronger 'risk research and judgment' to differentiate between “true innovation” NFTs and quasi-crypto “pseudo-innovation,” and emphasize the need to 'accurately punish crimes' when they are uncovered. Sign up here!Ĭhina's national agency responsible for legal prosecution published a new set of non-fungible token (NFT) guidelines on May 15, warning that NFTs are being used as a proxy for illegal securities and speculative digital assets. Receive a comprehensive recap of the day's top stories directly to your inbox.

Get all the essential market news and expert opinions in one place with our daily newsletter.

Among us 2021 crack